#60: Motivate Republican Senators to Get Right with the Constitution

Thank you for continuing to share these messages with your friends. If you are not already on our mailing list, please click here to be added to our list. You can also follow me on Facebook where you can read and share these messages. The more people we can reach, the more we contribute to this growing movement. We share these posts on our blog, A Path Forward to November 3, 2020, every two weeks, which means there will be a total of 100 missives before the Presidential election of 2020, in which our country will select a whole new course.

If we aren’t careful, we could talk ourselves into the wrong points of view. That would leave us less powerful at a time that we need to gather and utilize our power.

For instance, we could hear that the unenthusiasm of Queens residents for Amazon’s 25,000 jobs is some sort of indicator for how liberals and progressives think about jobs and economic growth in their own communities. But the fact is that Amazon intended to replace that community, not just bring it new economic opportunity. And for Queens and New York to have demonstrated their appreciation for having their community change dramatically, they would have needed to accede to a huge corporate assistance tax package.

We could hear that the Green New Deal is a socialist dream that will eliminate the support of independent voters for a Democratic candidate. But what it represents is the very beginning of an aspirational discussion. Its ideas will be modified and dealt with separately, not as an omnibus bill. Nonetheless, it is one part of an overdue exploration of how we can together boldly change the way America addresses (or ignores) its environmental future.

Similarly, Medicare for All is the platform for big believers and big dreamers, trying to confront the continued malfunctions of the American health care system, improved but by no means fixed by the Affordable Care Act. It represents the start of a new conversation, not the end of one.

Figuring out which Democrat to nominate for president is a huge decision. We can’t get that done by determining who has the best slogans or even the most combative attitude toward Donald Trump. What we most need is this marketplace of ideas, including any number of ideas that have been hidden or besmirched since Republicans took over the Congress in 2010. We can’t pick a president without understanding some of the finer points of how they differ from the other people who want to be president. We have more than a year to figure this out.

Policy ideas also force us to understand the distinctions between show horses and work horses, between elected officials who are authentically seeking reform and those who are too fully aware of the camera. Happily, Thomas Perez and the Democratic Party leadership are crafting rules for genuine televised debates where ideas are exchanged. The New Hampshire primary and Iowa caucuses will be great testing ground for which candidates have ways of thinking that are especially compelling, since success in these states depends upon meeting at length with small groups whose members ask pointed questions.

Since several of the candidates are Senators, we need to be able to sort out legislative proposals offered by Democratic leadership or by candidates to understand whether they have any particular significance.

1. Some proposals are meant only to stake out a position. Elizabeth Warren has proposed a wealth tax of 2% on assets over $50 million. The revenue would be used to fund child care support. There will be other candidates weighing in on how to assign a greater tax burden for the rich. None of their specific proposals will be advanced in the House, but they are useful for determining where the candidates stand, and how their position varies from that of other candidates.
2. Some proposals are intentionally broad in scope and are intended to grow a movement. This is the significance of both Medicare for All and the Green New Deal. They are aspirational and designed to lead over time to monumental change in the way things are done. At this point, they should spur debate, not end it. That’s why several Democratic presidential candidates endorsing the Green New Deal is dismaying. These candidates should be contributing to its design, not pretending it should be passed tomorrow.
3. Of special interest at this juncture are proposals that are being crafted to pass the House and be sent to the Senate, partly as a strategy to hold the House and seize the Senate in 2020. These proposals will be important legislative approaches on issues like voting rights, prescription drugs, and better protection for those with pre-existing conditions. They are not expected to become law, because Trump can veto them. They are being designed to either win over the four or five Republican Senators needed for passage (prior to the Trump veto), or to elicit political damage for the 12 or 13 Republican Senators thought to be vulnerable in November, 2020. As versions of them are debated in the Senate, they will also provide a window on the passion and creativity of candidates/Senators Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Booker, Sanders, Brown and Harris.
4. In a few instances, the House version will represent a major element in a legislative compromise which is likely to become law. This is the case with the recent bill that Trump bitterly signed and could happen with prescription drugs where both parties are committed to passing legislation.

The current dispute over Trump’s declaration of a national emergency falls squarely into category three. We will need at least four Republican votes in the Senate to temporarily block the declaration but would have no way of getting the twenty Republican votes we would need to override a subsequent Trump veto. Even so, it is important that we get the Senate (as well as the House) to go on record against the emergency declaration. This is why. It is a made up emergency. The emergency powers that Congress granted were never intended to be used for an appropriations dispute. Even more critically (and ultimately of greatest interest to the Supreme Court) it would represent a massive usurpation of the powers of the purse reserved to Congress in the Constitution.

Trump is doing improv. Mexico will pay for it until they aren’t paying for it. It is already being built but we need to start building. He could have waited but he needed the emergency declaration to do it now. The truth is that if Trump had not turned on Rush Limbaugh on a certain night in December, none of this would have happened. It is not worthy of the country that we love and the democracy that we defend.

So, we need to do these three things now:

1) Put Pressure on Republican Senators to Get Right With the Constitution
	Nate Silver’s 538 has done an excellent job of charting where Republican Senators stand on Trump’s declaration. He counts six Republican Senators as opposed. These include Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, who is retiring, and Rand Paul of Kentucky, who has his own way of thinking about most everything and may not be persuadable through any pleas we can muster. That leaves six Senators who have already said they are opposed to the declaration and need to be helped to maintain their resolve. Let’s go in the side door by calling as many of the main district offices of these six as we can. Please tell these six that they are being called upon to protect the fundamentals of governing in America, and that you are proud that so far they have stood for what is right: Ben Sasse of Nebraska: 402 550 8040 Lisa Murkowski of Alaska: 907 271 3735 Susan Collins of Maine: 207 780 3575 Marco Rubio of Florida: 305 418 8553 Thom Tillis of Nebraska: 704 509 9087 Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania: 215 241 1090 Then, as we work through our calls, we will realize that we are getting good at this, and we will decide to call a Senator who has expressed concerns, who is on the fence, and who is very worried about getting re-elected a year from November: Cory Gardner of Colorado: 305 418 8553
2) Help with Recruitment to Take Back the Senate
	We already know the blueprint, since we used it to take back the House in 2018. Coming up, we have a much more favorable map, with 23 Republican Senators up for re-election, and with up to 13 seats worthy of being heavily contested. Last time, we made massive gains among younger voters, independents, and suburban voters. We did that by letting Trump be Trump, by recruiting excellent candidates and by making millions of small contributions. We have an excellent candidate to recruit. We almost got Stacey Abrams over the top in her effort to be Governor of Georgia, but we were stymied by voter suppression. Now she is seriously considering running for the Senate in 2020. She needs our encouragement. You can start by getting her mobile alerts.
3) Make Certain Legal Action is Relentlessly Pursued
	The first thing to accomplish on the legal front is for multiple parties to file actions in federal courts challenging the emergency declaration. Eventually the cases will be consolidated. This is the rare case where “all the way to the Supreme Court” will surely come to pass, because the Supreme Court justices will not permit such an unusual and important case to be resolved at the federal appellate level. Among the emerging litigants, the consortium of 16 states and the American Civil Liberties Union already loom large. The ACLU is litigating on behalf of the Southern Border Communities Coalition. This Coalition includes sixty organizations serving border communities from Texas to California. It’s worth following and boosting, because we all will be pursuing fair and just border policies for some time to come.

If it weren’t such a dismaying and even frightening time, you could say all of this is exciting, no? We don’t have to worry for even a minute about being able to find consequential work to do. It’s there before us. It wouldn’t be overstating to say a nation hangs in the balance.

David Harrison
Bainbridge Island, Washington

#55: We Will Be Able to Dream About What America Can Become

When I started this series of missives in November of 2016, I was despairing. I felt even then that we could take back the House in 2018, and that we had a shot at protecting the Affordable Care Act. But I did not imagine that our resistance would reach its present capacity. The reason we had the largest mid-term election margin since World War II is because we all obsessed about taking back the House. Certainly we were fortunate to have some outstanding candidates, but the Person of the Year for 2018 should be the Trump resister, who made those campaigns rock.

Responding to my own despair and that of my dear family, I pledged to provide a missive every two weeks until 2020, when we will no longer have to use the word President and the word Trump in the same sentence. Just think of how elevating that will feel, to once again start to dream about what America can become. In each of my 54 blog entries, I have tried to chronicle what has been happening in a way that cuts through the overwhelming amount of information available and which identifies matters of special importance. I have sought to provide important context about how certain decisions are made and have avoided the temptation to dwell on snarky things that one could say about Donald Trump. I have offered three specific things that my blog readers can do about all of this. I have been pleased at the number of people who act on these three things most every time they receive the missive.

I started with a list of 250 people. Gratifyingly, I have received a steady stream of “enrollments”. Now, between the e-blast, the blog itself and the Facebook post I have 2200 “followers”. This does not account for the further “reach” gained when recipients share the blog with their friends. If you will, please help me add those friends to our list and think of others who can join in on this adventure. The strength of the resistance is that there are hundreds of groups like ours who are intent on changing the world, and that we all just proved that we can. Please help us do even better by continuing to share these messages with your friends, if you are not already on our mailing list, please click here to be added to our list. You can also follow me on Facebook where you can read and share these messages. You can also catch up on current and past missives on my blog page, A Path Forward to November 3, 2020.

Donald Trump made a very bad bet. In his previous life first as a real estate developer, and later as a marketer, he developed these habits--- promote your own brand aggressively, exaggerate as much as you can get away with, never apologize, and counterpunch against anyone who criticizes you, regardless of who they are and the significance or aptness of the criticism. He did not reckon that the brand promotion would be recognized as giving thanks for himself on Thanksgiving. As a real estate operative, he did not have to deal with fact checkers who keep posting and proving his prevarications. Once you are president, an ability to admit error and change course is essential, or you could get caught pretending that Kim Jong Un is your special friend who is ridding his country of nuclear weapons. He is not and they are not. Finally, the counterpunching eventually just makes you the world’s biggest bully. 

Many Republicans say that Trump’s political error in November was not talking enough about economic gains. They should be so lucky. He hemorrhaged votes in the suburbs not because these voters didn’t know what he has done, but because they did know both what he has done and, importantly, who he is and how he has done it. From the time that Ike was their uncle, Americans have judged a President’s character and voted as though character mattered. Too bad for Republicans that they have cast their lot behind someone whose tweets remind us of absence of character every single day.

It’s fair that in dying George H.W. Bush was remembered for his dedication to public service, and why wouldn’t we contrast it to Donald Trump’s lack of such dedication? And, it is fair that we find a lesson for these times around Bush’s gentler, kinder personal sensibilities which were seen as uncommon and were thus appreciated by other elected officials.
Of course, that’s why it was so disappointing that the father’s coalition effort to liberate Kuwait from Iraq morphed into the son’s made up war that has destabilized the Middle East. The senior Bush, Colin Powell, and Condoleeza Rice got played by Dick Cheney, and the world has been paying for it ever since.

All of which provides lessons for us as we realize we need to evaluate both the character and the policy approaches of the score of Democratic presidential candidates that are emerging. This vetting will seem odd for a while. For two years all of us have been focused on making Donald Trump an un-president. We have not had to stand by our own candidate. When we start doing the sorting, we are going to rediscover some differences among us.

We can handle that, because there is not as much of a gap between Democratic “liberals” and “progressives” as media commentators would want us to believe. You would be hard pressed to place all our shiny new members of Congress and our presidential candidates on some kind of center to left continuum. We will be able to nominate a ticket that keeps most all of us fully engaged in this movement. This outcome will be even more likely because Democrat primaries award delegates proportionally to the votes received, which will mean delegate totals will grow slowly, and the winnowing process will be as orderly as any group of Democrats can produce.

Those of us who are themselves part of a generation that brought us Trump, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush will understand why Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Michael Bloomberg and Elizabeth Warren still would deeply love to be president. It might be the hardest dream of all to put away. As kindly and gently as we can, we should let that them know that we are turning to younger generations, who bring a freshness to our party that will serve us well in November of 2020---- These candidates are Obama’s generation! Barrack Obama is 57. We could definitely stand more of that, no? Cory Booker is 49, Kamala Harris is 54. Amy Klobuchar is 58, Deval Patrick 62, Joaquin Castro 45, Michelle Obama 54, and Beto O’Rourke 46. There are others. Let’s see what their policy approaches are, and what character they can demonstrate.

Right now, it seems that all we are doing is waiting for Robert Mueller. There is no doubt that what he will have to say will be hugely consequential, and it is possible that it will mean that Trump will be unable to serve out his term. Here is a good place to never get ahead of ourselves. The fact that Democrats now control the House means that there will be evidence backing up some of our darkest suspicions about Trump and the Russians. And it could be that the evidence will be so strong that the House will be duty bound to pass articles of impeachment.

However, impeachment talk is political candy for some House members and they could stand to reduce their daily helping. They need to remember successful impeachment would require the votes of 20 Republican Senators. Without those votes, what would we be hoping to achieve? Now that we control the House, we have plenty of ways to expose the truth and support the upcoming indictments outside of the impeachment process. The real prize is not just in taking back the Presidency, but in restoring the American institutions that Trump has weakened and the rights he has trampled. Let’s keep our goals in the appropriate order.

And, in the meantime,we know the lame duck Congress is still sitting there in Washington D.C., and (for the moment) even worse, the lame duck Wisconsin State Legislature is still in session. It would be awful if those bent on whatever mischief they can get away with fell out of the habit of hearing from us. Here are three things we can do right now.

1) Stop the Perversion of the Democratic Process in Wisconsin
	The reason why the Wisconsin State Legislature is trying to limit the powers of incoming Democratic Governor Tony Evers is they can, as long as outgoing Republican Governor Scott Walker doesn’t veto their cynical, anti-Democratic actions. Some of these late night measures now before the Governor have been vetoed by him before, back when he was feeling it wasn’t such a great idea for the legislature to limit his powers over mostly minor disagreements. Among the provisions under consideration are moving the state’s job creation agency out from under the Governor’s control, and changing how the state decides to participate in lawsuits against the federal government. Republican Scott Walker might veto some or all of this package, which passed the Wisconsin Senate by one vote. If he does, it will be because he suspects the package passing will put him and Wisconsin Republicans under a cloud for a decade. Call the Governor’s office at 608-266-1212 and tell them they are right about that. In addition, attend to the fact that the bill restricts early voting to the two weeks before the election, for no other reason than to suppress voters. The advocacy group One Wisconsin Now believes they have legal grounds for a challenge. You can hear their argument, and you may decide to help them out.
2) Pass Criminal Justice Reform in the United States Congress Right Now
	It is difficult to collect a lot of praise from resisters for Jared Kushner. But it is indisputable that he has been an advocate for federal criminal justice reform, including considerable improvements in drug sentencing and modest improvements in judicial discretion. His early understanding of these issues came from his own father being incarcerated. Though Democrats would have liked the existing bi-partisan bill to go much further, it is still a breakthrough, and it will still release thousands of people from prison who no longer belong there. Can you imagine how much that matters to them and to their families? Mitch McConnell has still not committed to bringing the bill to the floor so the Senate can pass it (which it will) and so the President can sign it. Write or call your own two Senators. If they are already supporting it, please ask them respectfully to not come home for the holidays until they get this done.
3) Members of Congress, Tear Down that Wall
	There will be a government shutdown battle over walling out Mexico that will culminate on December 21. The dispute is between the $5 billion the House provided for a section of the wall and border security and the $1.5 the Senate provided for border security. The Republican leadership is trying very hard to avoid even a partial governmental shutdown on this issue, because they have discerned that it will be blamed on their party. As of this point, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are not being helpful to the Republican leadership, because they agree with the Republicans that Trump shutting down the government will be blamed on Republicans. This wall issue will be with us until Trump returns to marketing hotel properties he does not own. So, it would be a good idea if organizations of which you are a member make their opposition formal. Here’s the list to which you can add your favorite organization.

One step at a time is the way that we need to go about all of this. Through the hardest of work, we won back the House. For our troubles, we saved our country from some but not even close to all of the worst things this highly unusual American presidency will bring us. Let’s keep on. Let’s see each of ourselves as a member of the first team that is carrying on this fight. And, let’s remember we will have some repairs to do even after we regain the Presidency less than two years from now.

David Harrison
Bainbridge Island, Washington

#48: We Won't Stand Down, We Won't Stand Aside and We Won't Stand For It

Thank you for continuing to share these messages with your friends, if you are not already on our mailing list, please click here to be added to our list. You can also follow me on Facebook. The more people we can reach, the more we contribute to this growing movement. We share these posts on our blog, A Path Forward to November 3, 2020, every two weeks, which means there will be a total of 100 missives before the Presidential election of 2020, in which our country will select a whole new course.

Last week was about John McCain, but it wasn’t just about John McCain. Of course, we like to know that someone around us is larger than life in the way McCain was. But, it is the contrast to Trump and his smallness that gave the week its resonance. Susan Glasser of the New Yorker called the McCain funeral “the biggest resistance meeting yet.”

There was some audience approval when Megan McCain said her dad was a great man. “We gather to mourn the passing of American greatness, the real thing, not cheap rhetoric from men who will never come near the sacrifice.” Isn’t it a sad thing that we know exactly who she was referring to?
Now comes the hard part. What are we to do upon seeing hundreds of elected officials of both parties honoring someone with a conservative voting record for having values, being willing to be self-critical, and for being averse to being strong armed by his party? When we hear such things, and we see all that heartfelt honoring is going on, can’t we start expecting such behavior from the mourners? If these behaviors caught on, rather than McCain being the last of an era, he could be the first of the new era.

This project will take some time. It does seem clear that the quality of congressional deliberation shifts from decade to decade. We are right to dismiss any notion that Senators kowtowing to Trump is an inevitable thing, even though it seems endless when the kowtows are in progress. It certainly isn’t a certain outcome. Republicans Jacob Javits and Hugh Scott and Margaret Chase Smith were pivotal in the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As late as 2013, three Democrats seeking meaningful immigration reform were joined by three Republican Senators in making a major proposal--- Lindsay Graham, John McCain (unsurprisingly) and Marco Rubio (surprisingly)

Absolutely, there should be better Democrats, but let’s stay with Republicans for a while. With McCain’s passing, there are temporarily just 50 Republican Senators. How many do you suppose agree with Trump’s daily evisceration of the Department of Justice and the FBI? How many think Canada should be dragged into the mud, week after week? How many are happy that Trump trashes NATO, threatens to walk away from the World Trade Organization, and calls the press the enemy of the people?

The Senators who are true Trump acolytes are a very small number. The rest understand that he’s a bad president, and they have stories that they can tell in secret. But so far there is no queueing up to display political courage or principle. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski count precious few brave, principled moments, and they will now buy into a charade that Brett Kavanaugh has no antipathy to Roe v. Wade. For the most part, Bob Corker and Jeff Flake saved their eloquent dismay about Trump until after they decided not to run for office. Lindsay Graham will tell you every week that Donald Trump said something troubling, but he will do nothing to Trump that will risk his Senatorial nomination in 2020. Lamar Alexander, once a notable moderate, must avoid glancing in the mirror in the morning given the way he has let Trump knock him around. They know he won’t bolt, so they don’t defer to him.

When one is counting Republican Senatorial heroes, it is difficult to get to a higher number than two. Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Richard Burr is a hero for protecting Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein. He has formed a meaningful partnership with the ranking minority member, Mark Warner of Virginia. Beyond that, the man with McCain-like fortitude is Ben Sasse of Nebraska, who is up for election in 2020. He has said that Trump has no “core principles.” He is a reliable Republican vote, but thus far has avoided Graham’s obsequiousness. He might be preparing a 2020 presidential bid, and so might John Kasich. Either way it is nice to see Sasse’s wit and intellect in play. He said that instead of watching Trump at the nominating convention he would “take his kids to see some dumpster fires.”

What’s at work for all of them is the political calculus. As reported in previous missives, if you are a Republican Senator, you not only know what the Trump wing can do to you if you rebel, you know what they will do to you. The Trump-ites don’t even have to be even close to a majority of voters. They just need to have a good chance of beating you in the primary after you refuse to tack far enough to Trump’s positions.

Of course, we resisters have the last word. In many of these states, these Senators will eventually see that we will unseat them if they continue to be a part of this dragging down of our country. At the very least we respond to their Trump-coddling by putting them in the Senate minority in 2020 if not in 2018. The rationale that some of them have developed is that in sometimes subtle ways, they are a defense against the worst that Trump could do. And maybe some of them are providing such a defense. Of course, their gains are minor while Trump’s transgressions are major. These Senators are enabling the diminishment of their country. There are no John McCains here, so far.

The Washington Post says that “winter is coming” in the form of the Mueller report and that Trump is not prepared. The Post/ABC poll shows disapproval at an all-time high with strong disapproval far outdistancing strong approval.This is a very good sign for November election turnout. 

And there is one more question about the behavior of Republican Senators. In the Atlantic, Eliot Cohen suggests that nearly all tyrants are ultimately abandoned, since their power has no grounding. As Shakespeare said of Macbeth, “Those he commands move only in command, nothing in love. Now does he feel his title hang loose about him, like a giant’s robe upon a dwarfish thief?“ It seems obvious that many Republicans are with Trump absent another viable path. At some inflection point, that support may dissipate, as it did with Republican Senators and Richard Nixon.

Short of ten Senators walking away from Trump we are still holding out some hope that these Republican Senators will take a glance at the Bill of Rights on their office wall. They might then be jolted into action with the sudden recognition that Trump would delete most or all of those rights if he could. As early as November of 2018, and no later than November of 2020, we will have the Senate majority. For now, as we work to make that so, let’s ask Republican Senators to do these three things:

1) Protect the Justice Department from the President
	What would Republican Senators have done if Barack Obama had tweeted regularly that the Justice Department was failing to protect his political interests? They would have formed a vanguard to protect the Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. There has not been single president (until now) whose daily savaging of these agencies would have been permitted. This has to be taking its toll on these public servants. Let’s go to the subcommittee level, to the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism, which up to this point had proudly guaranteed that the FBI and the Criminal Division of the Justice Department would get the support they needed to do their job. Now they have been relegated to the position of wishing and hoping that the President would stop tweeting.  Call Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana, the subcommittee member who months ago derailed a Trump nominee for the federal bench for lack of qualifications. Tell John Kennedy that he should be protecting the department from political attacks. Phone his office at 202-224-4623. While you are at it, call the subcommittee’s Majority staff (who are less accustomed to hearing from citizens) and ask them to stand up for Justice. They can be reached at 202-224-5972. They can be asked to take heed of the aforementioned Ben Sasse. When Donald Trump criticized the insider trading and fraudulent campaign spending charges against two Republican members of Congress, Senator Sasse said: “The United States is not some banana republic with a two-tiered system of justice--- one for the majority party and one for the minority party.”
2) Insist that the Senate Stand Up for Canada
	As Trump picks other countries to attack for bad behavior, he has hit upon unloading on our best national friend and number one trading partner, Canada. At an earlier juncture, Trump was making up things about Justin Trudeau, but privately confiding that he had no knowledge of any existing trade imbalance. With any previous president, that may have seemed a surprise, but no one picked up on Trump’s admission. After Trump attacked Trudeau, Bob Corker and some other Senators from the Foreign Relations Committee held a meeting with the Canadian Ambassador to apologize for the President’s behavior. It’s time to recognize that apologizing is insufficient. There are at least two Republicans on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who are intent on courting independent voters. Call Rob Portman of Ohio at 202-224-3353 and Cory Gardner of Colorado at 202-224-5941 and tell them they should be remembering how much Canada means and has meant to the United States. Tell them you think it is their responsibility to do something in response to Trump’s actions.
3) Make Sure Claire McCaskill Gets Back to Washington
	In 2012, Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill was fortunate to be opposed by Todd Akin, who had said that women could not get pregnant through a “legitimate rape” because the body will prevent it. Six years later she has a serious opponent in a state whose citizens are still harboring their affections for Donald Trump. It could well turn out that the Senate majority will be riding on this race. Claire McCaskill is a fighter. Can you imagine how difficult it is to be a Democratic Senator in a state as red as is Missouri? You can make it just a tiny bit easier by making sure she has the funding to defend her seat. You can join “Team Claire” here and effortlessly use that magic card in your wallet to give her a boost.

It isn’t true Donald Trump will be automatically turned away if he does surreal things, or nasty, ill-informed things, or takes actions that deprive people of their constitutional rights, or lies or bullies or threatens, or subverts or attacks the underpinnings of democracy. This is not automatic. Instead, we must be part of a fierce, unrelenting effort. We won’t stand aside, we won’t stand down, and we won’t stand for it. Because we are doing the work that needs to be done, the voters will give us a very favorable progress report on November 6.

David Harrison
Bainbridge Island, Washington