#26: Make Steve Bannon a Sordid Historical Footnote

Thank you for continuing to share these messages with your friends, if you are not already on our mailing list, please click here to be added to our list. You can also follow me on Facebook. The more people we can reach, the more we contribute to this growing movement. We share these posts on our blog, A Path Forward to November 3, 2020, every two weeks, which means there will be a total of 100 missives before the Presidential election of 2020, in which our country will select a whole new course.

It is familiar in fiction - the delusional ruler, alone in his castle, raging. Jesters and flatterers are summoned, but the anger is unabated. There is much scurrying about. Knights and members of the ruler’s court are summoned. Ultimately, the ruler slumbers fitfully, and…

… Donald Trump is at peace, until the tweeting begins.

This is not a good non-fictional situation, it is fair to say. As a real estate developer, Donald Trump was in a business in which certain unscrupulous practitioners use exaggeration and misrepresentation as a business practice. His world tolerated and even encouraged ritualistic adversarial exchanges as deals were considered. Before he was sworn in, none of the virtues of the best presidents had ever found any home with him, certainly not Barrack Obama’s eloquence or intellectual grounding, or FDR’s ability to lead nations through tenacity and the strength of his ideas.

So, we are left with an unsuited and thus unsuitable president, and an ongoing governmental crisis. We must remind ourselves that we will prevail and regain a new equilibrium because we have to, and because:

• We have a constitutional system for which the checks and balances on the Presidency are very real, in which the courts and Congress can and do step in. It is the Congress that is doing too little but still is protecting Robert Mueller and sanctioning Russia, and the courts that are impeding some of the worst of the executive orders.

• We have an election in just a year in which we will take back the House and gain an extra set of brakes. This will be especially helpful in fighting back against the Trump/Pruitt decimation of environmental protection. If the election were held today, we would win 40-50 seats, exceeding the 24 we need. Donald Trump’s support has deteriorated to its lowest level.

• We have Senators McCain, Flake, Collins, Murkowski, and Corker who have openly broken ranks on specific issues. Others like Lamar Alexander of Tennessee have forged bi-partisan approaches. Even though these tales of forthrightness and occasional personal political sacrifice are far too few, they are not insignificant.

The Congress will pass a tax bill this fall, because they must. Both they and Donald Trump need to say that they did this, or they will be portrayed as having had a lost year. They just got their votes to increase the deficit by $1.5 trillion over the next 10 years, which is an unusual thing to be saying about a party that has trumpeted the need for balanced budget. Unfortunately for them, Trump has made tax cut promises requiring at least three times as much deficit spending as that $1.5 trillion. In his world, he doesn’t have to recognize that these numbers don’t add up. It’s a con.

What should we be most focused on as we do our resistance work?

We must be ever-obsessed with wealth distribution in America. Since the 1982 tax bill, tax policy has reduced the progressivity of the tax code and thus contributed to the growing concentration of wealth in the top 10%. The White House has been using mathematical gymnastics to argue that it is self-evident that any tax bill will disproportionately benefit the very rich, because they pay more taxes. That contention is false. Adding insult to injury, their draft proposals would eliminate both the estate tax, the alternative minimum tax, and lower taxes on pass through profits from limited liability companies - three taxes paid only by exceedingly wealthy people.

From this point on, it is all about evaluating the various proposals on their distributional impact. We must make certain that every tax proposal that is floated is subject to this test, and tailor our notes to Congress accordingly. There are three things we can do today:

1) Let the Ways and Means Committee Know You’re Out There
	There are 40 members of the House Ways and Means Committee, which will start the action by reviewing the proposal of their chair, Kevin Brady, which he has prepared in conjunction with Paul Ryan. The proposal is already being opposed by the Republican-leaning National Association of Home Builders. It’s complicated, but they are worried that the proposed increase in the standard deduction would decrease itemizers and thus the impact of the existing mortgage deduction, and consequently destabilize the housing market. They wanted a fix through a new tax credit, and were turned down. This back and forth is relevant because it creates a more receptive climate for your letter. The Republicans on the committee will come together to pass a bill, but many will be influenced by their mail and calls, as they pick and choose their pain and gain. The 40 members of the committee are spread across the country, so chances are good there will be one or more from your state for you to send a note or make a call. That’s good thing because it will be easier for you to deal with the defenses members are setting up to decrease their out of state email. See the committee member list here. The best argument to emphasize is the need for the bill to attend to middle class taxpayers. Please note for them that you as a voter are watching their actions on this specific issue.
2) Figure Out What is Happening on SALT, and Act Accordingly
	Republicans in higher tax states are very worried that their taxpayers will be disproportionately impacted as the deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) is pared back or eliminated. This is complex, too, because the relative impact on the middle class and the very wealthy of rolling back this tax break depends on each state’s tax structure. It is certainly the case that decreasing this deduction in order to raise revenue to make it possible to eliminate the alternative minimum tax and the estate tax is a bad deal for the middle class and everyone else who doesn’t pay these two taxes. Thus, it is a good idea to go all the way back to your own state legislators from your own district. You can send them an email and make sure they are focused on what’s happening on this issue on the federal level. You can ask them to examine the impact on middle income taxpayers and be in contact with members of Congress.
3) Celebrate That Life Isn’t Just About Money
	In the midst of all the legislative focus on the making and keeping of money, a federal district court judge has blocked enforcement Trump’s awful ban on transgendered people in the military. Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly was first appointed to the bench by Ronald Reagan. She has ruled the plaintiffs are likely to ultimately win on the merits. In addition to a victory for justice and fairness, this story is about what smaller organizations can do. The organizations bringing suit were GLBQT Legal Advocates and the National Center for Lesbian Rights. Write and thank one or both of them, and if you possibly can, click and send a celebratory contribution that will help them pay for legal costs going forward. GLBQT Legal Advocates National Center for Lesbian Rights

Steve Bannon is out there somewhere, doing his venal thing. He is hoping the intensity of your effort will wane. He and his followers are kindly called “economic nationalists” by the media. He is banking on them prevailing, and so is Donald Trump. It is up to all of us to make such an outcome not just inconceivable, but impossible. You can make Steve Bannon a sordid historical footnote.

David Harrison
Bainbridge Island, Washington